Dengarkan dan baca

Masuki dunia cerita tanpa batas

  • Baca dan dengarkan sebanyak yang Anda mau
  • Lebih dari 1 juta judul
  • Judul eksklusif + Storytel Original
  • Uji coba gratis 14 hari, lalu €9,99/bulan
  • Mudah untuk membatalkan kapan saja
Coba gratis
Details page - Device banner - 894x1036
Cover for Playing it Safe: How the Supreme Court Sidesteps Hard Cases and Stunts the Development of Law

Playing it Safe: How the Supreme Court Sidesteps Hard Cases and Stunts the Development of Law

Seri

1 dari 11

Bahasa
Inggris
Format
Kategori

Non Fiksi

It is one of the unspoken truths of the American judicial system that courts go out of their way to avoid having to decide important and controversial issues. Even the Supreme Court from which the entire nation seeks guidance frequently engages in transparent tactics to avoid difficult, politically sensitive cases. The Court's reliance on avoidance has been inconsistent and at times politically motivated. For example, liberal New Deal Justices, responding to the activism of a conservative Court, promoted deference to Congress and the presidency to protect the Court from political pressure. Likewise, as the Warren Court recognized new constitutional rights, conservative judges and critics praised avoidance as a foundational rule of judicial restraint. And as conservative Justices have constituted the majority on the Court in recent years, many liberals and moderates have urged avoidance, for fear of disagreeable verdicts. By sharing the stories of litigants who struggled unsuccessfully to raise before the Supreme Court constitutional matters of the utmost importance from the 1970s-1990s, Playing it Safe argues that judges who fail to exercise their power in hard cases in effect abdicate their constitutional responsibility when it is needed most, and in so doing betray their commitment to neutrality. Lisa Kloppenberg demonstrates how the Court often avoids socially sensitive cases, such as those involving racial and ethnic discrimination, gender inequalities, abortion restrictions, sexual orientation discrimination, and environmental abuses. In the process, the Court ducks its responsibility to check the more politically responsive branches of government when "majority rule" pushes the boundaries of constitutional law. The Court has not used these malleable doctrines evenhandedly: it has actively shielded states from liability and national oversight, and aggressively expanded standing requirements to limit the role of federal courts.

© 2023 NYU Press (Ebook): 9780814749357

Tanggal rilis

Ebook: 21 November 2023

Tag

    Selalu dengan Storytel

    • Lebih dari 900.000 judul

    • Mode Anak (lingkungan aman untuk anak)

    • Unduh buku untuk akses offline

    • Batalkan kapan saja

    Terpopuler

    Premium

    Bagi yang ingin mendengarkan dan membaca tanpa batas.

    Rp39000 /bulan
    7 hari gratis
    • 1 akun

    • Akses Tanpa Batas

    • Akses bulanan tanpa batas

    • Batalkan kapan saja

    • Judul dalam bahasa Inggris dan Indonesia

    Coba sekarang

    Premium 6 bulan

    Bagi yang ingin mendengarkan dan membaca tanpa batas

    Rp189000 /6 bulan
    7 hari gratis
    Hemat 19%
    • 1 akun

    • Akses Tanpa Batas

    • Akses bulanan tanpa batas

    • Batalkan kapan saja

    • Judul dalam bahasa Inggris dan Indonesia

    Coba sekarang

    Local

    Bagi yang hanya ingin mendengarkan dan membaca dalam bahasa lokal.

    Rp19900 /bulan
    7 hari gratis
    • 1 akun

    • Akses Tanpa Batas

    • Akses tidak terbatas

    • Batalkan kapan saja

    • Judul dalam bahasa Indonesia

    Coba sekarang

    Local 6 bulan

    Bagi yang hanya ingin mendengarkan dan membaca dalam bahasa lokal.

    Rp89000 /6 bulan
    7 hari gratis
    Hemat 25%
    • 1 akun

    • Akses Tanpa Batas

    • Akses tidak terbatas

    • Batalkan kapan saja

    • Judul dalam bahasa Indonesia

    Coba sekarang