Prashant Bhushan Case: Time to Revisit ‘Contempt of Court’ Clause?

0 Ocena
0
Odcinek
52 of 511
Czas
18min
Język
angielski
Format
Kategoria
Literatura Faktu

Can a bona fide critical opinion about the country's highest court amount to contempt of court? How should the Supreme Court react to criticisms against itself? Is it time to revisit the contempt of courts clause? Does it go against the freedom of speech under Article 19 of the Constitution?

The Supreme Court's suo moto contempt petition against advocate Prashant Bhushan over some of his tweets has raised a lot of such debates and questions. Even the legal fraternity is divided on it. At least 10 retired judges including Jasti Chelameshwar, AP Shah, Madan B Lokur are in solidarity with Bhushan on this.

Is it an archaic law? What kind of arguments are being made? What kind of criticism is it drawing? Tune in to The Big Story!

Producer and Host: Shorbori Purkayastha Guest: Vakasha Sachdev, Legal Editor, The Quint

Editor: Shelly Walia

Music: Big Bang Fuzz

Listen to The Big Story podcast on:

Apple: https://apple.co/2AYdLIl

Saavn: http://bit.ly/2oix78C

Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/2ntMV7S

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2IyLAUQ

Deezer: http://bit.ly/2Vrf5Ng

Castbox: http://bit.ly/2VqZ9ur Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


Słuchaj i czytaj

Witaj w nieskończonym świecie literatury

  • Czytaj i słuchaj jak chcesz i ile chcesz
  • Ponad 500 000 tytułów
  • Tytuły dostępne wyłącznie w Storytel oraz Storytel Originals
  • 7-dniowy bezpłatny okres próbny
  • Łatwa rezygnacja w dowolnym momencie
Wypróbuj
PL - Details page - Device banner - 894x1036

Możesz polubić także ...