Ascolta e leggi

Entra in un mondo di storie

  • Ascolta e leggi quanto vuoi
  • Oltre 400.000 titoli
  • Prova gratis per 14 giorni, poi 9.99€/mese
  • Disdici quando vuoi
  • Ascolta titoli esclusivi e Storytel Original
Prova Gratis
Device Banner Block 894x1036

The Correlation-Causation Fallacy: Assuming Correlation Implies Causation

1 Valutazioni

5

Durata
2h 25min
Lingua
Inglese
Format
Categoria

Corsi di lingua

The correlation-causation fallacy is a common error in reasoning where people mistakenly believe that because two events or variables are correlated, one must have caused the other. This fallacy is not only widespread but can have significant consequences in various aspects of life, including science, policy-making, and everyday decision-making. It stems from the human tendency to look for patterns and explanations, often leading us to draw conclusions from observed associations without carefully analyzing the underlying mechanisms at play.

At its core, the fallacy occurs when a correlation—meaning two variables move together in some way—is confused with a causal relationship, where one variable directly influences or causes changes in the other. Correlation does not imply causation, a principle that is fundamental to sound scientific reasoning and critical thinking. For example, if there is a correlation between the number of hours spent watching TV and the number of people eating unhealthy food, it would be erroneous to conclude that watching TV causes people to eat poorly. Other factors, such as time spent sitting idle or lifestyle choices, could be influencing both variables. The danger of assuming causation based on correlation is that it leads to misguided conclusions, decisions, and actions.

This fallacy can often be found in media reports, advertising, and even scientific studies. Headlines like "Studies show that eating chocolate improves memory!" or "Increased spending on education leads to higher student performance" may imply a direct causal relationship based on observed correlations, but they neglect to account for potential confounding variables or the possibility of coincidence. In more complex situations, the misinterpretation of correlations can lead to flawed public policies, ineffective interventions, and misplaced public fear or optimism.

© 2025 Valeria Rama LLC (Audiolibro): 9798347982936

Data di uscita

Audiolibro: 26 gennaio 2025

Potrebbero piacerti

Scegli il tuo piano

  • Più di 400.000 titoli

  • Kids Mode (accesso sicuro per bambini)

  • Scarica e ascolta offline

  • Disdici quando vuoi

Il più popolare

Unlimited

La scelta migliore per 1 utente. Ascolta e leggi quanto vuoi.

9.99 € /mese
14 giorni gratis
  • 1 account

  • Ascolto illimitato

  • Disdici quando vuoi

Prova ora

Unlimited Annuale

12 mesi al prezzo di 9. Ascolta e leggi quanto vuoi.

89.99 € /anno
14 giorni gratis
Risparmia il 25%
  • 1 account

  • Ascolto illimitato

  • Disdici quando vuoi

Prova ora

Basic

Per te che non sei un avido ascoltatore.

6.49 € /mese
14 giorni gratis
  • 1 account

  • 10 ore/mese

  • Disdici quando vuoi

Prova ora

Unlimited+

Storie per tutta la famiglia. Entrate insieme in un mondo di storie.

14.99 € /mese
7 giorni gratis
  • 2 account

  • Ascolto illimitato

  • Disdici quando vuoi

Prova ora